My Program mapped to AI Competency Framework for Educators
based on AI Competency Framework for Educators
AI Competency Framework Assessment Matrix
Based on actual session content analysis from Weeks 1-7 transcripts.
Assessment Scale
- 0: No contribution
- 1: Minimal awareness building
- 2: Basic skill development
- 3: Moderate competency with practical application
- 4: Strong competency development with advanced techniques
- 5: Comprehensive mastery enabling leadership
1. Professional Engagement
| Sub-Competency | Rating | Evidence from Program | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 Newcomer | 4/5 | • Langdock platform introduction as AI aggregator • Multiple LLM access (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini) • Basic AI tool understanding and setup | Strong foundational introduction to AI tools with hands-on platform access. Participants gain immediate exposure to professional AI environments. |
| A2 Explorer | 4/5 | • PACT assistant creation and experimentation • Active exploration of AI feedback mechanisms • Integration testing with personal knowledge | Excellent active exploration phase with practical experimentation. Participants move beyond passive consumption to active AI tool testing. |
| B1 Integrator | 3/5 | • AI workflow integration across capture-organize-distill-express • Regular use of AI assistants in knowledge work • Obsidian-Langdock integration for seamless workflows | Good integration of AI into established professional practices, though limited to knowledge management context. |
| B2 Expert | 2/5 | • Custom assistant creation skills • Jan’s advanced coaching assistant example • Limited advanced professional applications shown | Some advanced techniques demonstrated but not comprehensively developed across all professional contexts. |
| C1 Leader | 1/5 | • Minimal organizational leadership focus • No explicit guidance on leading AI adoption in teams | Very limited content on leading others in AI adoption or organizational change. |
| C2 Pioneer | 0/5 | • No policy development content • No institutional change frameworks • No cutting-edge AI research integration | No evidence of pioneering or policy-level AI competency development. |
Overall Professional Engagement: 3/5
2. Digital Resources
| Sub-Competency | Rating | Evidence from Program | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 Newcomer | 4/5 | • Building Block Assistant for content refinement • Basic AI-enhanced content creation workflows • Introduction to AI content processing | Excellent introduction to AI-powered resource creation with immediate practical application. |
| A2 Explorer | 4/5 | • Transcript processing for educational content • AI content enhancement experimentation • Julia’s podcast workflow development | Strong exploration of various AI content creation approaches with real-world applications. |
| B1 Integrator | 4/5 | • Express Assistant for content creation guidance • Obsidian-AI integration for resource workflows • Systematic AI integration in content pipelines | Excellent integration of AI into content creation workflows with systematic approaches. |
| B2 Expert | 3/5 | • Custom assistant building for specific resource needs • Advanced content processing techniques • Iterative improvement of AI-generated content | Good advanced techniques but limited to specific use cases rather than comprehensive expertise. |
| C1 Leader | 2/5 | • Limited guidance on leading resource creation teams • Some examples of sharing AI workflows | Minimal leadership focus in AI resource creation, though some peer sharing occurs. |
| C2 Pioneer | 1/5 | • Limited cutting-edge resource innovation • No systematic evaluation frameworks for AI resources | Very limited pioneering approaches to AI resource creation and evaluation. |
Overall Digital Resources: 4/5
3. Teaching and Learning
| Sub-Competency | Rating | Evidence from Program | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 Newcomer | 2/5 | • Basic AI awareness through general tool exposure • Limited teaching-specific AI context • General learning enhancement principles | Minimal specific focus on AI for teaching, though general AI awareness is developed. |
| A2 Explorer | 2/5 | • Jan’s coaching assistant from YouTube content • Limited exploration of AI in educational contexts • Some transferable learning principles | Some exploration of AI for learning support but not systematically focused on teaching applications. |
| B1 Integrator | 1/5 | • Minimal AI integration into teaching strategies • No explicit classroom AI integration guidance • Limited student-facing AI applications | Very limited content on integrating AI into actual teaching practices or student interactions. |
| B2 Expert | 1/5 | • No advanced teaching-specific AI applications • Limited pedagogical AI expertise development • No AI-enhanced curriculum design | Minimal development of expert-level AI teaching competencies. |
| C1 Leader | 0/5 | • No teaching leadership with AI content • No guidance on leading educational AI initiatives | No evidence of developing AI teaching leadership capabilities. |
| C2 Pioneer | 0/5 | • No innovative teaching methodology development • No cutting-edge educational AI research • No pedagogical innovation frameworks | No pioneering educational AI development content. |
Overall Teaching and Learning: 1/5
4. Assessment
| Sub-Competency | Rating | Evidence from Program | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 Newcomer | 1/5 | • Basic feedback through PACT assistant • Limited assessment-focused AI exposure • General feedback mechanisms | Minimal exposure to AI assessment concepts, only basic feedback functionality. |
| A2 Explorer | 1/5 | • Very limited assessment tool exploration • No systematic assessment AI experimentation • Minimal evaluation-focused content | Almost no exploration of AI assessment tools or methodologies. |
| B1 Integrator | 0/5 | • No AI assessment integration content • No systematic evaluation workflows • No assessment-specific AI tools | No evidence of integrating AI into assessment practices. |
| B2 Expert | 0/5 | • No advanced assessment AI tools • No automated grading or feedback systems • No learning analytics applications | No development of expert-level AI assessment competencies. |
| C1 Leader | 0/5 | • No assessment leadership content • No guidance on leading assessment innovation | No leadership development in AI assessment. |
| C2 Pioneer | 0/5 | • No innovative assessment development • No cutting-edge evaluation research • No assessment methodology innovation | No pioneering assessment AI development. |
Overall Assessment: 0/5
5. Empowering Learners
| Sub-Competency | Rating | Evidence from Program | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 Newcomer | 3/5 | • Personalized AI assistants introduction • Individual knowledge integration • Basic self-directed learning support | Good introduction to personalized AI that can support individual learner needs. |
| A2 Explorer | 3/5 | • Custom assistant creation for individual needs • Exploration of personalized AI workflows • Individual learning style considerations | Solid exploration of how AI can be customized for different learning approaches. |
| B1 Integrator | 3/5 | • AI-enhanced self-directed learning systems • Integration of personal knowledge with AI • Systematic personalization approaches | Good integration of AI for self-directed learning, though limited diversity focus. |
| B2 Expert | 2/5 | • Advanced personalization techniques • Limited focus on diverse learning needs • No accessibility-specific AI applications | Some advanced personalization but lacks comprehensive diversity and inclusion focus. |
| C1 Leader | 1/5 | • Minimal learner empowerment leadership content • Limited guidance on supporting diverse learners • No systematic inclusion frameworks | Very limited leadership development for empowering diverse learners with AI. |
| C2 Pioneer | 0/5 | • No innovative inclusion/accessibility development • No cutting-edge diversity research • No systematic accessibility frameworks | No pioneering work in AI for learner empowerment and inclusion. |
Overall Empowering Learners: 3/5
6. Facilitating Learners’ Digital Competence
| Sub-Competency | Rating | Evidence from Program | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 Newcomer | 4/5 | • Multi-LLM exposure (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini) • Hands-on AI platform experience • Basic AI literacy development | Excellent foundational AI literacy with exposure to multiple platforms and practical experience. |
| A2 Explorer | 3/5 | • Hands-on AI tool experimentation • Jan’s practical AI applications • Real-world AI use case exploration | Good exploration of AI capabilities through practical applications and real examples. |
| B1 Integrator | 3/5 | • AI assistant building skills • Integration of AI into daily workflows • Systematic AI tool usage | Solid integration of AI tools into regular practice with systematic approaches. |
| B2 Expert | 2/5 | • Understanding AI capabilities/limitations • Custom assistant development • Limited advanced AI concepts coverage | Some expert-level skills in AI tool creation but limited comprehensive AI education. |
| C1 Leader | 1/5 | • Limited AI education leadership content • Minimal guidance on teaching AI to others • No systematic AI curriculum development | Very limited focus on leading others in AI competency development. |
| C2 Pioneer | 0/5 | • No AI ethics curriculum • No societal impact frameworks • No cutting-edge AI research integration | No pioneering AI education development or ethical frameworks. |
Overall Digital Competence: 3/5
Summary Matrix
| Competency Area | A1 | A2 | B1 | B2 | C1 | C2 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional Engagement | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3/5 |
| Digital Resources | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4/5 |
| Teaching and Learning | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1/5 |
| Assessment | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/5 |
| Empowering Learners | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3/5 |
| Digital Competence | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3/5 |
Key Insights
Strongest Areas (4-5/5):
- Digital Resources: Excellent practical AI integration for content creation with systematic workflows and real applications
Moderate Areas (2-3/5):
- Professional Engagement: Strong foundation (A1-A2) but limited advanced/leadership applications
- Empowering Learners: Good personalization focus but lacks diversity and inclusion emphasis
- Digital Competence: Strong hands-on experience but limited comprehensive AI education
Weakest Areas (0-1/5):
- Assessment: Almost no AI assessment tool coverage or evaluation frameworks
- Teaching and Learning: Minimal direct teaching applications despite transferable skills
Progression Pattern:
- Excellent at A1-A2 (Newcomer-Explorer) levels: Strong foundational AI exposure and experimentation
- Moderate at B1-B2 (Integrator-Expert) levels: Good practical integration but limited advanced expertise
- Weak at C1-C2 (Leader-Pioneer) levels: Minimal leadership development or cutting-edge innovation
Overall Program Rating: 2.3/5 - Provides solid foundational to intermediate AI competency development with particular strength in digital resource creation and practical AI tool usage.
Enjoy this post? 
Notes mentioning this note
There are no notes linking to this note.