It is not VARK
LinkedIn Post
The learning style lie I believed
(I even avoided podcasts for years because of this)
For years, I followed the VARK myth:
Visual, Auditory, Reading, Kinesthetic learning preferences.
I labeled myself a “Reading/Writing learner.”
I even avoided podcasts and audiobooks.
(Big mistake!)
According to research, there’s no credible evidence supporting VARK learning styles.
——— AD BREAK - SKIP! ———
Learning Styles Discovery Workshop on January 14th!
Limited to 30 seats - free but application required!
Apply now: https://lnkd.in/ecP8T_jp
——— END OF AD ——— (did you skip successfully?)
———
Perplexity.ai:
Despite its popularity in educational settings,
there is no credible evidence supporting the effectiveness of matching teaching methods to VARK learning styles.
———
So I dug deeper and discovered something better.
These four learning styles match reality much better:
———
→ Innovative/Imaginative Learners:
Focus on personal meaning and connections, asking “Why?”
→ Analytic Learners:
Seek facts and conceptual understanding, asking “What?”
→ Common Sense Learners:
Prefer hands-on experiences and practical applications, asking “How?”
→ Dynamic Learners:
Enjoy self-discovery and exploring possibilities, asking “If?”
Check out:
———
→ “I admit, I count IKEA screws” - My journey as a WHAT-Learner
(see https://lnkd.in/ecSecAg3)
→ “I discovered why my coworker drove me crazy” - How different styles clash and complement
(see https://lnkd.in/eMNrk6K4)
Curious to discover your learning style?
Learn why it matters and how to uncover blind spots!
Join my (free) Learning Styles Discovery Workshop on January 14th!
Limited to 30 seats - free but application required!
Apply now: https://lnkd.in/ecP8T_jp
Content preparation
Posted on LINKEDIN on 2025-01-08_Wed
Linking
